|
When asked by a client to assess their total operational environment for overall processes improvement, several steps are applied as precursors to process engineering/reengineering. Keya first focuses on those corporate-wide tasks that are basics to launching a comprehensive multi-process improvement effort. These pre-emptive services to the actual BPR are:
1. Organizational Planning: Keya distills the client's mission along with its long-term and break-through objectives. We help clients define ultimate goals, determine the current situations and develop the strategies for achieving the goals.
2. Current Performance
Assessment: This phase is
a corporate-wide intensive scrutiny
of “line (key)” processes
to determine if one or more line processes
is paramount to change. To achieve
this objective, Keya consultants employ
a multi-faceted analytical tool known
as SWOT. This analysis views the major
categories of processes for their
inherent “Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities and Threats.”
Once conducted, all findings contribute
to priority ranking of processes that
are targeted for improvement via BPR.
3. Strategic Benchmarking
for Best Practice Analysis:
Keya develops benchmarking strategies
using the steps below:
• Our team will research common
practices in your industry and identify
the best.
• We will identify a benchmark
for the best practices in your industry.
• Using the Best Practices Benchmark
and the Baseline Analysis, we produce
a
preliminary functional economic analysis
(FEA) of the "AS-IS" process.
Essentially, we help clients place
a cost on the inefficiencies of their
current processes. The FEA is a resource
scoping of the functional change-cost
impact specified by the proposed “TO-BE”
process for client management consideration.
Keya’s recommended TO-BE process
is not in the form of a single offering.
Rather Keya’s consultants present
client management with a TO-BE process
containing three alternative FEAs
for deciding which FEA is more conducive
to the client’s budgetary constraints.
The three “TO-BE” offerings
are complementary to one another and
are upward compatible. This provides
client management with a flexible
program allowing a client to remain
in budget: at the same time allowing
for a later date change to alternative
2 or 3 without the duplicating cost
of a re-do effort.
4. Transitional strategies (a dual path structure): Our team then works with the client to lay out a dual-path implementation structure. We help clients phase-out their legacy systems, while we help them phase-in the new or re-engineered systems. When we phase-in a new process, we also develop documentation for continuous improvement. These strategies are applied primarily in government where multiple systems for the same service exist in various sectors of the same department i.e. the Department of Defense (DOD).
APPROACH
Keya utilizes the following step-down approach for BPR delivery:
1. Identify Processes for Improvement:
Depending on the scope of the Client’s
assigned task this effort may be for
one or for multiple processes that
tend to vary extensively in complexity.
2. Select an Empowerment Team:
Keya consultants know (from experience)
that when the Client’s incumbent
staff is not involved or given cursory
responsibility in process improvement,
a consultant’s improved system
is short lived, because in a sense,
the consultant “owns”
the improved process. Conversely,
when key incumbents of the process
are empowered properly without predisposed
restrictions, those employees immediately
“buy-in” to the resulting
process improvement. This is so because,
through active participation the client’s
empowerment team takes “ownership”
of the achievements that they can
then readily and enthusiastically
perpetuate.
3. Perform Baseline Analysis of the AS-IS Process by Activity: The first step to baseline analysis is documenting the process targeted for improvement at the Activity level of detail.
To manage the re-engineering phase, we complete the following:
| • |
Keya compares the
AS-IS analysis and results from
the benchmark. |
| • |
Based on this comparison, we
recommend an ideal system (the
"TO-BE" process), which
meets our client’s objectives.
|
| • |
We document the “TO-BE”
with a comprehensive program that
includes an analysis of the risk
associated with the "TO-BE"
process. |
|